One of the articles I wrote was a business forecast for 2008. I predicted that there will be no huge political events that will have a big impact in the economy, unfortunanately I was wrong.
Now we are living back in hell again as calls for the President to step down is back on full swing. This time is because of charges of alleged corruption as a result of the ZTE-NBN broadband deal.
The name "Jun Lozada" has become so popular and has always been associated with the ZTE-NBN broadband deal controversy.
By now most webmasters and bloggers are exploiting the key word "Jun Lozada" considering it's being high-trend, low-dense keyword.
This is not an article on optimizing the "Jun Lozada" keyword. This article seeks to answers only this question that is, whether Jun Lozada is a Hero or a hypocrite.
Jun Lozada's actions and what he says will reveal why he decided to testify against the administration. As can be inferred from his word and actions, these are his reasons:
1.) Jun Lozada could not bear the burden anymore. He became guilty of being a party to the anomalous act that he helped facilitate. He repented of his sins and decided to testify. 2.) Somehow his deep love for his country reminded him of his responsibility to become patriotic.
On the other hand the administration and other people paint Jun Lozada as somebody who is a hypocrite because of the following reasons and circumstances:
1.) Jun Lozada admitted that he helped commit the offense before he repented; 2.) Jun Lozada never had the intention to testify in the Senate. The fact that he went to Hongkong to evade Senate inquiry proves such. But because of the pressure that he has been receiving from the Senate, he decided to tell all. In short his testifying is not because he was guilt-stricken or because of his patriotism. He was only forced to do it because he was pressured to.
What do you think ? Is Jun Lozada a hero or a hypocrite?
When presented with two strong opposing theories or hypothesis scientist have a way of coming up with a simple conclusion. This simple logical principle is known as "Occam's razor." Wikipedia says that the principle of Occam's razor simply states that "the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory." In simple terms what it is saying is that "All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best."
Using this simple principle, all things being equal, did Lozada testify because he was guilt stricken and moved with loved for his country or did he testify because of surmounting pressure? Take note, the simplest explanation is the best. Jun Lozada - Hero or hypocrite? Decide for yourself!
Now we are living back in hell again as calls for the President to step down is back on full swing. This time is because of charges of alleged corruption as a result of the ZTE-NBN broadband deal.
The name "Jun Lozada" has become so popular and has always been associated with the ZTE-NBN broadband deal controversy.
By now most webmasters and bloggers are exploiting the key word "Jun Lozada" considering it's being high-trend, low-dense keyword.
This is not an article on optimizing the "Jun Lozada" keyword. This article seeks to answers only this question that is, whether Jun Lozada is a Hero or a hypocrite.
Jun Lozada's actions and what he says will reveal why he decided to testify against the administration. As can be inferred from his word and actions, these are his reasons:
1.) Jun Lozada could not bear the burden anymore. He became guilty of being a party to the anomalous act that he helped facilitate. He repented of his sins and decided to testify. 2.) Somehow his deep love for his country reminded him of his responsibility to become patriotic.
On the other hand the administration and other people paint Jun Lozada as somebody who is a hypocrite because of the following reasons and circumstances:
1.) Jun Lozada admitted that he helped commit the offense before he repented; 2.) Jun Lozada never had the intention to testify in the Senate. The fact that he went to Hongkong to evade Senate inquiry proves such. But because of the pressure that he has been receiving from the Senate, he decided to tell all. In short his testifying is not because he was guilt-stricken or because of his patriotism. He was only forced to do it because he was pressured to.
What do you think ? Is Jun Lozada a hero or a hypocrite?
When presented with two strong opposing theories or hypothesis scientist have a way of coming up with a simple conclusion. This simple logical principle is known as "Occam's razor." Wikipedia says that the principle of Occam's razor simply states that "the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory." In simple terms what it is saying is that "All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best."
Using this simple principle, all things being equal, did Lozada testify because he was guilt stricken and moved with loved for his country or did he testify because of surmounting pressure? Take note, the simplest explanation is the best. Jun Lozada - Hero or hypocrite? Decide for yourself!
About the Author:
Zigfred Diaz does not only write about Jun Lozada in his blog. He writes about other interesting including money management, investments, business, law, leadership, SEO, theology, faith, live and living. Visit his blog today !
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment